{ COMPLIANCE_AND_REGULATORY_READINESS }

Turn proven exposure
into audit-ready evidence.

The rest of the platform proves and ranks your risk. This is where validated exposure and PoC evidence become governance-mapped, audit-ready reporting, without ever claiming to make you compliant.

ISO/IEC 27001DORANIS2PCI DSS
Reference points, not certifications.
Validated risk to governance Mapped, not guaranteed
Audit-ready report SummaryScopeFindingsEvidenceStatus
{ THE_EVIDENCE_GAP }

Security teams produce findings.
Auditors ask for evidence.

Most security tooling ends where governance begins. A list of vulnerabilities is not proof that risk was understood, prioritized, and managed. Between the two sits a translation problem, and it is where audit readiness usually breaks down.

Technical findings What testing produces
  • Scanner output and long CVE lists
  • Severity scores with no business context
  • Screenshots that are hard to verify later
  • No link to a control or a requirement
  • A backlog nobody can turn into an audit answer
Governance evidence What audit needs
  • Validated risk, exploited or exploitable
  • Contextual risk, not raw severity alone
  • PoC evidence captured under controlled conditions
  • Each finding mapped to the controls it touches
  • Remediation status an auditor can follow

A FINDING SHOWS A WEAKNESS. EVIDENCE SHOWS YOU MANAGED IT.

{ VALIDATED_RISK_TO_REQUIREMENTS }

Validated risk, mapped
to the requirements that govern you.

Mind The Hack takes the exposure the other pages prove and rank, and maps it to the controls and frameworks your organization answers to. Security progress reads as governance progress, from a single validated dataset, without re-running the work.

01 Validated finding Exploited or exploitable, with PoC evidence
Map
02 Mapped to controls Linked to the requirements it touches
Assemble
03 Evidence assembled Proof, context, and remediation status
Report
04 Audit-ready output The report auditors and boards expect
Control mapping Validated findings, mapped to framework requirements
Validated finding Contextual risk Maps to Control / requirement Remediation status
Authentication Bypass via SQL Injection 9.4 ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.15 Access control Open
SQL Injection 9.4 ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.18 Access rights Open
Path Traversal 8.3 NIS2 Risk-management measures Resolving
XML External Entity Injection 8.6 PCI DSS Requirement 6 Open
CSP Not Implemented 4.6 ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.1 Policies Resolved

Mind The Hack maps validated risk to control requirements and tracks remediation status. It supports audit-ready reporting. It does not certify, guarantee, or make an organization compliant with any framework.

ONE VALIDATED DATASET, MANY FRAMEWORKS.

{ AUDIT_READY_REPORTING }

The report your audit
actually asks for.

Every section is backed by validated risk and PoC evidence, so the report reads the same whether it lands with the board, an auditor, or the engineers doing the work. The MITRE ATT&CK heat map rides alongside as a technical reference, mapping what was observed to recognised adversary behaviour.

Regulatory Readiness Report Evidence-backed
Audit-ready deliverable

Validated exposure, mapped to your governance requirements

PDF XLSX CSV
  1. Executive summary Cyber risk in language the board can act on.
  2. Scope What was assessed, and how it was tested.
  3. Validated findings Exploited and exploitable, not theoretical.
  4. PoC evidence Proof captured under controlled conditions.
  5. Contextual risk Prioritized by real impact, not raw severity.
  6. Remediation status Open, resolving, resolved, or regressed.
{ FRAMEWORKS_SUPPORTED }

Reference points,
not compliance claims.

Validated risk and its evidence can be mapped to the frameworks your organization answers to. Mind The Hack supports the reporting these frameworks expect. It is not a certification, and it does not decide whether you are compliant.

Reference point

ISO/IEC 27001

Information security management

Maps validated findings to Annex A controls, for example A.5.15 access control, and tracks remediation as evidence.

Supports and maps to
Reference point

DORA

Digital operational resilience

Supports ICT risk-management and resilience-testing evidence with validated exposure and attack-path context.

Supports and maps to
Reference point

NIS2

Network & information security

Supports risk-management measures and incident-readiness evidence with proven, prioritized risk.

Supports and maps to
Reference point

PCI DSS

Payment data security

Supports vulnerability-management and secure-development requirements with validated, retested findings.

Supports and maps to

Mind The Hack supports audit-ready reporting and maps validated risk to governance requirements. It does not certify compliance, and using the platform does not make an organization compliant with any framework. The frameworks named here are reference points for how validated exposure can be mapped and evidenced.

{ MAP_YOUR_VALIDATED_RISK }

Prove the risk.
Then evidence it.

Run Mind The Hack against your real environment. Validate exposure, capture PoC evidence, and turn it into reporting mapped to the frameworks that govern you.

Supports audit-ready reporting. Not a certification.